WRITE CENTER
  • Home
  • Webinars
    • Access Webinar Replays
  • UCLAIMS
    • Exploratory Research
    • Research Basis
    • Research Measures
    • Digital Tools
    • UCLAIMS Curriculum
  • Blog
  • Research
    • Research Categories
    • WRITE Research
    • WRITE Presentations
  • About
    • Meet the Team >
      • Leadership Team
      • Advisory Board
    • Newsroom
    • Contact Us
  • Field Trial Materials for Participating Teachers

How do Writing Workshops Support Doctoral Student Writers?

10/21/2020

 

By Jiali Wang and Jacob Steiss

In this study, Dr. Barbara Sarnecka and colleagues examine the impact of writing workshops on graduate students' writing quality, writing practices, and overall well-being.​


​Extensive, multiple-draft, text-based writing is complex and challenging for any writer. Perhaps no group of students can better attest to the truth of this statement than doctoral students writing their way towards a Ph.D. 

Writing academic articles for peer-reviewed journals, preparing dissertation drafts, incorporating reviewer feedback into drafts of writing, and working with coauthors, are just a few of the challenging activities doctoral students engage in as they hone their skills as researchers, teachers, writers, mentors, and communicators.
Picture
Click to read for free:  Sarneka. B. W. (2019) The writing workshop: Write more, write better, be happier in academia. 

Why writing workshops?

One reason to use writing workshops is for building a community of practice. Sarnecka sees workshops as "groups of people who share an interest in doing something and who learn how to do it better as they regularly interact.”

Writing workshops also provide time for regular, consistent writing, help promote physical and mental health of students, and provide strategies for composing.

Despite the many reasons for engaging in writing workshops, there have been only a few studies to test the effectiveness of writing workshop for improving writers and writing.

To address this gap, Barbara Sarnecka and colleagues conducted a randomized control trial, to assess the effectiveness of a 5-week (30 total hours) writing workshop for doctoral students.

What did the workshops look like?

Students in the workshops received explicit instruction and guided practice by trained facilitators. Students were encouraged to write in shorter regular periods of time and set goals for writing, including:
  • ​Long-term goals (1-5 years)
    • EXAMPLE: Finish collecting data and writing introduction and literature review by end of next year.
  • Medium-term goals (10 weeks)
    • EXAMPLE:  Review ten papers/books/articles. Write short summaries and synthesize them.
  • Short-term goals (daily or weekly)
    • EXAMPLE: Make outline of first draft and schedule meeting with advisor to review outline.

After the first five weeks of workshops, some students participated in peer-led writing groups for an additional five weeks. These groups wrote together and exchanged feedback on drafts as they had during the workshops but received no more instruction.

Dr. Sarnecka sees the following as key to workshops:

1) distributed practice (short sessions of writing that fit more easily into a busy work schedule)

2) helping students set guidelines to maintain well-being and mental health while writing (including taking short breaks)

​3) explicit instruction in how specific disciplines conduct research, genres of academic writing, and norms regarding publishing and review

​
After the workshops, some students participated in peer-led writing groups. These groups wrote together and exchanged feedback on drafts as they had during the workshops.

Want to know more about how to structure a writing workshop? Read Sarnecka’s book which addresses the following topics:
Picture

How did the workshops help doctoral students?

The study found that students: 
  • enjoyed writing more
  • found writing easier
  • had more confidence as writers
  • engaged in more planning, reflection, and revision
​
Additionally, while the effects of educational interventions such as workshops often fade over time, this study found that positive effects of the intervention were sustained if students participated in peer-led writing groups after the workshops.

It is worth noting the study did not find any effects on 1) actual time spent writing, 2) the quality of writing, or 3) overall student well-being.

What are the key takeaways?

Picture
Attitudes about writing can be changed (even late in a student’s career and in challenging and complex genres)
Picture
​​A significant barrier to writing is the perception of the task. Many students overestimated the time they needed to write. After the intervention, students  shortened their estimates of time needed to write and wrote more frequently.​ 
Picture
Reflection and positive thinking can be tied to productive writing. The habits of a productive writer extend beyond the writing task into daily planning, useful breaks, and positive self-talk. 
Picture
Caveats: These are doctoral students engaging in scientific and academic writing, and such a writing workshop intervention may not have similar effects for different students writing in different genres. ​
What are you planning for your next writing workshop?
Picture

Interested in guest blogging for the National WRITE Center? See our guidelines by clicking here. 


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019

    Categories

    All
    Academic Language
    Argumentative Writing
    Civic Literacy
    Culturally Responsive Literacy
    Disciplinary Literacy
    Key Practices
    Partner Resources
    Reading Instruction
    Research To Practice
    Strategy Instruction
    Tech Tools
    WRITE Center Resources
    Writing Instruction

WRITE Center:  Writing Research to Improve Teaching and Evaluation

The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305C190007 to University of California, Irvine. In 2025 the National Writing Project took over management of this website and project resources. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.
Picture
© COPYRIGHT 2025. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Home
  • Webinars
    • Access Webinar Replays
  • UCLAIMS
    • Exploratory Research
    • Research Basis
    • Research Measures
    • Digital Tools
    • UCLAIMS Curriculum
  • Blog
  • Research
    • Research Categories
    • WRITE Research
    • WRITE Presentations
  • About
    • Meet the Team >
      • Leadership Team
      • Advisory Board
    • Newsroom
    • Contact Us
  • Field Trial Materials for Participating Teachers