WRITE CENTER
  • Home
  • Webinars
    • Access Webinar Replays
  • UCLAIMS
    • Exploratory Research
    • Research Basis
    • Research Measures
    • Digital Tools
    • UCLAIMS Curriculum
  • Blog
  • Research
    • Research Categories
    • WRITE Research
    • WRITE Presentations
  • About
    • Meet the Team >
      • Leadership Team
      • Advisory Board
    • Newsroom
    • Contact Us
  • Field Trial Materials for Participating Teachers

The What and Why of Disciplinary Literacy

9/30/2020

 

By Jacob Steiss and Jiali Wang

Students use varied and complex literacy skills to solve problems and communicate their thinking in science, history, and English Language Arts. To support students’ continued development in these areas, teachers need to build students’ literacy skills toward discipline-specific ways of reading and writing. In this blog, we respond to the following questions:  
  1. What is disciplinary literacy?
  2. Why do differences in disciplinary literacies matter?
We conclude with a brief overview of Project READi, which offers teachers free resources to build their disciplinary-literacy instructional approach. 

​What is disciplinary literacy?

Folks in different disciplines have distinct ways of speaking, writing, engaging in inquiry, and solving problems. While surface-level similarities exist between reading in science and reading in history (e.g. processing information at the word, sentence, and text levels), Project READi asserts the products and goals of reading in the disciplines require tailored disciplinary literacies.
Picture
Dr. Susan Goldman, Project READi team member, notes that literary analysis is guided by the purpose of better understanding the human condition and universal themes. This purpose then drives certain disciplinary reading and thinking practices like identifying and analyzing the development of a theme in literary texts.
Meanwhile in the discipline of history, reading for the purpose of historical interpretation requires skills like contextualizing primary sources and corroborating accounts of events by different actors in order to better ascertain a reasonable and reliable historical interpretation. In the digital word, corroborating takes place through lateral reading. The differences that exist in literary spaces, history, and science are not limited to each discipline’s goals, lexicon, and standards for evidence and therefore require distinct literacy skills.

Why do differences in disciplinary literacies matter?

At the secondary level, teachers often attend to foundational literacy skills like summarizing information, generating claims, and using evidence and experiences to support claims. However, carefully considering the specific disciplinary literacy skills students need to engage in complex, literate acts within that discipline is also important.
Below, we showcase discipline-specific literacy practices in ELA, science, and history. Notice the commonalities and differences between them. 

Literacy Practices in English Language Arts

Picture

​Literacy Practices in Science 

Picture

​Literacy Practices in History

Picture
Given the different purposes for reading and writing in the disciplines, it is likely that teachers’ instructional approaches for reading and writing will be different. Calling out these discipline-specific differences for students can help them build greater awareness of how language is used according to different (discipline-specific) rhetorical situations. Each rhetorical situation shares five elements with other rhetorical situations:
  1. A text (i.e., an actual instance or piece of communication)
  2. An author (i.e., someone who uses communication)
  3. An audience (i.e., a recipient of communication)
  4. Purposes (i.e., the varied reasons both authors and audiences communicate)
  5. A setting (i.e., the time, place, and environment surrounding a moment of communication)
Based on the rhetorical situations students will encounter in your classroom, consider how you might scaffold the disciplinary literacy students need.

What are some ways teachers are advancing disciplinary literacy in the classroom?

A group of educators and researchers at Project READi have developed lessons and assessments for teaching contemporary literacies and reading skills.
Picture
In this six-minute video, Dr. Susan Goldman of Project READi, describes the rationale behind the disciplinary approach to researching and improving student’s literacy skills. She suggests that these practices should be developed through responsive instruction and alongside the learning of the content. Disciplinary literacy skills may support students when tackling the complex problems in their worlds, perhaps while working withing interdisciplinary teams.

How might you better support students' disciplinary literacy? 

Interested in guest blogging for the National WRITE Center? See our guidelines by clicking here. ​

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019

    Categories

    All
    Academic Language
    Argumentative Writing
    Civic Literacy
    Culturally Responsive Literacy
    Disciplinary Literacy
    Key Practices
    Partner Resources
    Reading Instruction
    Research To Practice
    Strategy Instruction
    Tech Tools
    WRITE Center Resources
    Writing Instruction

WRITE Center:  Writing Research to Improve Teaching and Evaluation

The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305C190007 to University of California, Irvine. In 2025 the National Writing Project took over management of this website and project resources. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.
Picture
© COPYRIGHT 2025. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Home
  • Webinars
    • Access Webinar Replays
  • UCLAIMS
    • Exploratory Research
    • Research Basis
    • Research Measures
    • Digital Tools
    • UCLAIMS Curriculum
  • Blog
  • Research
    • Research Categories
    • WRITE Research
    • WRITE Presentations
  • About
    • Meet the Team >
      • Leadership Team
      • Advisory Board
    • Newsroom
    • Contact Us
  • Field Trial Materials for Participating Teachers